Atlantis Alumni

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

The Progressive Argument Against The Bailout

NOTHING in this "bailout" package will lower the price of the gas you have
to put in your car to get to work. NOTHING in this bill will protect you from
losing your home. NOTHING in this bill will give you health insurance...This
bailout's mission is to protect the obscene amount of wealth that has been
accumulated in the last eight years. It's to protect the top shareholders who
own and control corporate America. It's to make sure their yachts and mansions
and "way of life" go uninterrupted while the rest of America suffers and
struggles to pay the bills. Let the rich suffer for once. Let them pay for the
bailout. We are spending 400 million dollars a day on the war in Iraq. Let them
end the war immediately and save us all another half-trillion dollars!

- Michael Moore

Brooks: What Now?

The only thing now is to try again — to rescue the rescue. There’s no time
to find a brand-new package, so the Congressional plan should go up for another
vote on Thursday, this time with additions that would change its political
prospects. Leaders need to add provisions that would shore up housing prices and
directly help mortgage holders. Martin Feldstein and Lawrence Lindsey both have good proposals of the sort that could lead to a plausible majority coalition.
Loosening deposit insurance rules would also be nice.

I rarely agree with David Brooks, conservative columnist at the Times, but today he gets it right. The "bailout" must include provisions to help average Americans, directly helping mortgage holders. Brooks also clearly acknowledges that the Republicans and McCain are to blame for the demise of the bailout. Let's see what happens today.

Jim

Monday, September 29, 2008

Krugman: The U.S. Is Now A Bannana Republic

So what we now have is non-functional government in the face of a major
crisis, because Congress includes a quorum of crazies and nobody trusts the
White House an inch.As a friend said last night, we’ve become a banana republic
with nukes.

Like I posted recently, we are witnessing the fall of the American empire. This is the final result of almost thirty years of Reaganomics.

Jim

Cafferty On Palin

Jack is one of my favorite people on TV. Not because he makes statements but because he has the guts to ask questions.

I was watching 60 Minutes last night and I saw three idiots from a University prattling on about how they would be comfortable with Sarah Palin as President. Really? You've got to be kidding. I wasn't too enamored with the concept of Hilary as President but boy, I would vote, donate and jump through any hoop before I'd let Sarah Palin roll her brood up onto the Whitehouse lawn.

Take a look:

Les Misbarack

Change we can believe in...with music!

Sunday, September 28, 2008

Let me paint you a picture.

The Wall Street Corporate Welfare Package is almost ready to go. It will feed the American addiction for fast fixes to complex problems.

Remember, we don't even know the right questions yet: how much will it really cost, where did the Wall Street collapse come from and how will it really effect normal, middle and low income people?

So let me paint you a picture.

The American Economy is like a table. It gets held up by quite a few legs and is fairly resilient and strong. Think of a hardwood table made of Amish barnwood from Pennsylvania. They are built incredibly well and last hundreds of years.

We have this piece of legislation to save Main Street/Wall Street that seems to be getting "bipartisan" support. Thus John McCain and Joe Lieberman should be having epileptic fits right in the middle of congress. Bipartisan is a new, favorite word for politicians. I have to think it means compromise for both political parties with a great outcome for politicians but a huge loss for normal citizens like you and I.

The American Economy has many legs however 4 major support legs are actually on fire. The top of the economy is us. Taxpayers.

The first leg is the most obvious, Wall Street. I don't buy the whole concept put forth by pundits that Wall Street was innocently participating in a pyramid scheme that was bound to collapse. I read some of the mortgages that were percolating to my mailbox starting 5 years ago. They were shady, they continue to be shady and it was obvious to me than that the model wasn't sustainable. Financial companies could not keep issuing these mortgages without an eventual collapse.

I have the benefit of having worked with large financial companies for the last 13 years and I can absolutely tell you nothing happens by accident or without full knowledge and disclosure within the organizations.

Don't be fooled; attempting a quick fix for this problem won't fix our entire economy, it may not even fix this problem. The United States needs to define the problem first and consult some intelligent people before we solve it. There's no quick fix, no easy answer. $700 billion is a straight piss away of cash.

The second leg of the table that is burning is the cost of fuel. The Republican controlled government (plus Joe Lieberman) ushered in higher petrol costs and Americans are getting comfortable with the $3 to $4 prices. We were shocked into this. The problem is the doubling of petrol costs trickles into heating oil, natural gas. You name it. Cost of food, clothing, every consumer good essentially needs to rise to offset the cost of increased manufacturing and distribution cost. Oh yes, the cost of raw goods, like say, plastics also goes through the roof. $700 billion for Wall Street will have zero impact on the cost of gas.

By the way, the second burning leg gets more expensive as we delay looking for real alternatives to be used nationwide INSTEAD of gasoline. Drilling offshore is an expensive short term solution that won't solve our energy dependency needs. Nor does anyone want spent fuel from a reactor sitting in their backyard (oh ya, nuke power plants can get kind of messy and still take some time and money to build). This is a national security issue becaue our power grid is so critical and so is our national supply chain. Maybe we should be looking at some other alternatives like modernizing railroads.

The third leg on fire is the fleeing of jobs across borders. This might be obvious to some, especially those that have trained their replacements in another country. Welcome to maximin theory folks (maximizing profits and minimizing costs). When your job flees to South America, Eastern Europe or Asia, let me know if that business school training still makes so much sense and feels soooo good. I doubt it.

Jobs are critical at all levels of our society. They give people a sense of purpose and there is honor in labor well done. The revenue generated by people at work is key to our economic ecosystem. When our neighbor is out of work it hurts everyone. For every dollar your neighbor spends it keeps a couple of other people in the community employed and producing. Forget growth, we can't survive without a high employment rate.

The fourth leg that is almost burnt to a cinder is the war. Regardless of whether it was right or wrong, we can't afford it anymore. The government has gone from a substantial surplus to a substantial debt. To keep pursuing it fiscally is insane. Let me spell it out:

We don't have enough money to continue the war.

We just don't have it. And McCain is very wrong about cutting further into the government budget. As was said in the debates, if earmarks are $18 billion and represent government waste (which is not necessarily true by the way) and we assume another $5 billion to $10 billion can be cut, that still pales in comparison to the cost of the war. The war is nearing a $trillion$.

It doesn't take an accounting genius to see that we have a huge fiscal crisis at home and we're spending like crazy in multiple wars simulataneously. By the way, most war historians will tell you that opening multiple wars on different fronts is a "bad" idea. Historically, how many wars have been won that were fought with no allies on multiple fronts? Folks, as much as anything else; it's a resource issue. We don't have the resources to do this. And by the way, it also has the added benefit of being wrong.

We also have a nice fire under the tabletop of the US Economic Table. It's called health insurance. It's so important that it isn't really even a leg, it's part of our base in the economy. Without delivng too much into a discussion that is already well under way; our healthcare system is severely out of whack for everyone but the most wealthy. Healthcare is largely un-affordable for most Americans. No news there. But with the other 4 fires we have in our economy, how long will it be before people that get sick or need major medical help won't be able to pay? How long before the healthcare industry is looking at a major bailout?

Oh yes, and there is the nasty little turd someone left under our table that has come to be known as the auto industry. Years of willfull ignorance on the part of overpaid Detroit auto executives just took a dump under my burning table. It will take roughly $25 billion to get the stain out of my carpet along with the damage done to the table from the fire. And by the way, that $25 billion clean up bill comes with no guarantee whatsoever that jobs for Americans will get saved. Fancy that.

Ok, so we have a pretty large table with four of the main support legs on fire and smoldering at the base. Perhaps this isn't the time to do a quick fix? Maybe we want our government to step back and look at this, maybe do a quick study on the problem with some of the great minds we have in this country? Maybe we need a plan, not a fix.

I'd like to have as much of the fire out as possible before I put anything else on this table.

One thing is for certain, there aren't any easy answers and our table is still on fire.

Marc

Did Obama Win The Debate?

Much of the post-debate conventional wisdom seems to give Obama the win. This is based upon viewing Obama's kalm and kool performance against McCain as strategically smart, sort of a political "rope-a-dope" ploy that had the effect of showing McCain as an angry old man and Obama as someone voters can be comfortable voting for.

Maybe the majority of the pundits are right and I'm wrong, but Maureen Dowd and I are in agreement about Obama's debate performance:

Given the past week, the debate should have been a cinch for Obama. But, just as in the
primaries, he willfully refuses to accept what debates are about. It’s not a
lecture hall; it’s a joust. It’s not how cerebral you are. It’s how visceral you
are. You need memorable, sharp, forceful and witty lines.
Even when McCain
sneered, “I don’t need any on-the-job training, I’m ready to go at it right
now,” Obama didn’t directly respond,
but veered off into a story about his father being from Kenya and how he got his
name. (Thanks, Barack, we got that from your book. It’s great for a
memoir, but not a debate.)
McCain kept painting Obama as naïve, and dangerous,
insisting that he “doesn’t quite understand or doesn’t get it.”
Obama should have
responded “Senator, I understand perfectly, I’m just saying you’re wrong.”

So we'll see in the next debate if either candidate changes their tactics.

Jim

Saturday, September 27, 2008

Funny Sarah Palin Joke

Jimmy Kimmel:

"John McCain showed up without running mate Sarah Palin, which is a shame
because she actually has a lot of experience with financial matters. You know,
she lives right next to a bank."

Nasty McCain, Cool Obama: The First Debate

McCain was nasty but came off as the more decisive, continually hitting Obama as not understanding Iraq and being inexperienced. Obama made some good points, but his demeanor was too mild. McCain scored the kind of rhetorical jabs that resonate with people, Obama did not. I would say that McCain clearly won the debate on points even though neither candidate scored a knockout. Democrats, no matter who they nominate, seem to be unable to duke it out with Republicans on the level that appeals to average voters, who are not sophisticated and tend to view debates like they are sporting events. Silly little phrases like "you don't understand" mean nothing substantive but mean everything to voters with sports fan mentalities. Republicans like McCain know how to play the rhetorical game. Obama does not. Too bad. I think Obama's chances were not helped by last night's debate.

Jim

Friday, September 26, 2008

I have some ideas about the economy....

Ok, so I've heard a substantial amount of criticism about the bail out plan. I'm actually tired of hearing all the bitching and political nonsense around this problem. It was inevitable, something anyone that could read recognized more than two years ago and needs some dynamic thinking to get fixed. So here are some ideas to get us on the mend:

What if we stopped spending hundreds of millions in Iraq this week by recalling our troops?

Why don't we cut the military's budget by at least 40% immediately and mandate that a certain % of the existing budget be focused on the veterans (has to be a whole number above 10%).

By the way, I think weapons and heavy military spending are a waste of cash and we seem to be out of it as is. Who are we kidding? The military needs to be a little smarter about how we spend our $$$. The war and our military spending reminds me of someone sitting with a max'ed out credit card buying stuff on HSN at 2 am in the morning. We can't afford anymore cheap cubic zirconia weapons of mass destruction yet we seem to keep buying them as the clock goes down and our interest rates go up.

Let's go on:

Why can't we convene a special investigators office out of the GAO and the Treasury to audit (yes, audit) the records and information from the top Wall Street offenders? At the end of the audit, we'd have a complete idea of what was spent, where and what is owed (and to whom).

Why are we in such a hurry for a quick fix? I've seen no proof that this problem can be fixed by spending our way out of it? If you fail to plan, you plan to fail. Why can't we, meaning our government, look at this a bit more like a long term infrastructure project:

  1. Map out the problem. Do an audit of the system as well as of the offending companies.
  2. Weed out the offending companies and put an immediate stop to bad trade practices.
  3. Map out the business problems and come up with proposed ideas or solutions.
  4. We have some of the brightest minds in the world, why can't we convene a panel from our top schools, top business leaders and ordinary people that stand nothing to gain from a multinational bank or financial institution?
  5. Maybe we can ask some people that aren't total screw ups like the Swiss? Maybe there are people in this world that are doing things differently and looking at the same problems different ways.
  6. We should set a real time frame to solve these issues. Let's face it, this is borne out of American's addiction to getting things without having the money to pay for them. So set a timeframe out for a fix and live with some pain and hassle for a while. Not everything is easy.
  7. At the end of the project the American people should have an infrastructure to better support our finances and way of life. Kind of like our roads, sewer, water and power grid. They aren't perfect but they are vastly more predictable.
  8. One more thing, we need to put in place laws and regulations that penalize people and companies that take advantage of our free market. Some of the millionaire motherfuckers that outright stole from the most needy in our society (such as senior citizens and those that can't help themselves living below the poverty level) need to get ass raped in prison, repeatedly.
  9. How about we spend a minute or two looking back on history and considering past solutions to current problems. We seem to not give a shit about history in this country. We had this thing called "The Great Depression". Ponzi schemes and scumbag financiers put us there. How did we get out of it? We've had several crisis in this country before this one and I don't seem to remember anyone chucking $700 billion on the fire and hoping that everything gets better. That kind of reasoning hasn't worked so well for our country for the last 8 years.
Ok, anger aside, our representatives can no longer blow George Bush and his minions ad nauseam. Democrats, you can be replaced as well. This isn't rocket science here folks. Thousands of years of great thinkers and civilizations have risen and fallen before us. One thing to consider though: while we screw up the rest of the world is learning from our mistakes at lightspeed. While we march around with collective head up our nationalistic asses waving the flag and jabbering on about how America is free and the greatest country in the world, our enemies and allies alike are putting controls in place to keep the flailing, spastic Americans from tanking their economies again. If you think we look silly now wait until the rest of the world puts up its' collective nose at us and tells us to come back when we learn to be civilized.

I have some experience climbing out of holes and I can tell you it is much harder to climb out of a deep hole by yourself. And when you aren't a millionaire and you have a kitchen table full of unpayable bills, the world can feel pretty damn lonely.

Seems like right now we're acting like children minus parental supervision. We need to do better than this.

Marc

PS I am a huge fan of Dave Ramsey. Remember what Dave says: The borrower is a slave to the lender. We need to stop being borrowers to start a road to recovery.